Impacto de las Maniobras de Reposicionamiento en el grado de discapacidad de pacientes con Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno del conducto semicircular posterior

Introducción. El Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno (VPPB) del canal semicircular posterior es una enfermedad crónica que afecta severamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes que lo sufren. Para su manejo existen las Maniobras de Reposicionamiento, que son una serie de ejercicios secuenciales de la cabeza en 4 posiciones. El propósito de la maniobra es reposicionar los otolitos desde el conducto semicircular posterior dentro del vestíbulo a los sitios de donde migraron para dejar de producir vértigo. Permaneciendo en cada posición aproximadamente 30 segundos. Las maniobras han demostrado gran eficacia a corto plazo. Los resultados son medibles por medio de un cuestionario conocido como Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Objetivos: Medir el impacto de las maniobras de reposicionamiento en la discapacidad en los pacientes con Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno del conducto semicircular posterior, mediante el uso del DHI. Metodología. Es un estudio comparativo que utiliza la T de Student para muestras pareadas donde cada paciente es su propio control, se tomó una muestra de 20 pacientes diagnosticados con Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno del conducto semicircular posterior que serán tratados con maniobras de reposicionamiento, serán evaluados mediante la herramienta (DHI) que será completada por los pacientes al inicio del estudio, al día 7 y día 30, luego de realizadas las Maniobras de Reposicionamiento. Resultados: Las mujeres son las más afectadas por el (VPPB) del canal semicircular posterior en una relación de 2.1 aproximadamente. El grado de discapacidad fue medido por el resultado del DHI, el cual muestra para los días 1, 7, y 30 una media de 50.4, 30.4 y 24.2 respectivamente. La escala con mayor punteo durante los días 1, 7, y 30 fue la escala funcional mostrando una media de 20, 12.2, y 9.5 respectivamente. Las diferencias entre las medias fueron estadísticamente significativas. (p= 0.00006, 0.000002 y 0.03701). Conclusiones: El padecimiento de VPPB del conducto semicircular posterior afecta la calidad en el estilo de vida de las personas. Las maniobras de reposicionamiento son estadísticamente significativas para disminuir la incapacidad generada por el vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno del conducto semicircular posterior por lo que es importante acudir rápidamente al médico especialista cuando se manifiesten los primeros signos y evitar así aumentar la discapacidad total asociada al vértigo. Palabras Clave: Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico (VPPB), otolitos, Dizziness Handycap Inventory (DHI).

Introduction. Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) of the posterior semicircular canal is a chronic disease severely affecting quality of life. Repositioning Maneuvers is a way of relieving it, consisting of a series of sequential exercises of the head into 4 positions. The purpose of the maneuver is to reposition the otoliths from the posterior semicircular canal inside the lobby to the sites where they migrated to stop producing vertigo. Each position has to remain for approximately 30 seconds. The maneuvers have proven to be highly effective in the short term. The results are measurable by means of a questionnaire known as Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Objectives: To measure the impact of repositioning maneuvers on disability in patients with BPPV of posterior semicircular canal, using the DHI. Methods: A comparative study using T-test for paired samples where each patient is his own control was used in a sample of 20 patients diagnosed with BPPV of posterior semicircular canal were studied and treated with repositioning maneuvers. Results were evaluated by DHI and ran in day 1, day 7 and 30 after Repositioning maneuvers performed. Results: Females are most affected by BPPV in a ratio of approximately 2.1. The degree of disability was measured by the result of DHI, which shows for days 1, 7, and 30 an average of 50.4, 30.4 and 24.2 respectively. The scale with a higher score were days 1 and 7 then showing a marked decreased on day 30. Mean results were the 20, 12.2 and 9.5 respectively. The differences between the means were statistically significant. (P = 0.000062, 0.000002 and 0.037010). Conclusions: BPPV affects the quality of life. Repositioning maneuvers are statistically significant to reduce the disability caused by BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal so, it is important to quickly see a specialist when first signs manifest and that way avoid increasing the total disability associated with vertigo. Keywords: Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), Otolith, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)

Management of anterior skull base defect depending on its size and location.

INTRODUCTION: We present our experience in the reconstruction of these leaks depending on their size and location. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent advanced skull base surgery (large defects, >20 mm) and 62 patients with CSF leaks of different origin (small, 2-10 mm, and midsize, 11-20 mm, defects) were included in the retrospective study. Large defects were reconstructed with a nasoseptal pedicled flap positioned on fat and fascia lata. In small and midsized leaks. Fascia lata in an underlay position was used for its reconstruction covered with mucoperiosteum of either the middle or the inferior turbinate. RESULTS: The most frequent etiology for small and midsized defects was spontaneous (48.4%), followed by trauma (24.2%), iatrogenic (5%). The success rate after the first surgical reconstruction was 91% and 98% in large skull base defects and small/midsized, respectively. Rescue surgery achieved 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery for any type of skull base defect is the gold standard. The size of the defects does not seem to play a significant role in the success rate. Fascia lata and mucoperiosteum of the turbinate allow a two-layer reconstruction of small and midsized defects. For larger skull base defects, a combination of fat, fascia lata, and nasoseptal pedicled flaps provides a successful reconstruction.

Manejo de las fístulas nasales de líquido cefalorraquídeo según su tamaño. Nuestra experiencia / Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks according to size. Our experience

Objetivo: Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el cierre de fístulas de líquido cefalorraquídeo según su tamaño y localización. Material y método: Se incluyeron 54 pacientes con tumores de base de cráneo intervenidos mediante cirugía endoscópica (defectos grandes) y 62 pacientes con fístulas de otra causa (defectos pequeños y medianos). Los defectos grandes fueron reparados con un colgajo nasoseptal previa colocación de grasa y fascia lata y drenaje lumbar. En las fístulas de otra causa se aplicó fluoresceína al 5% intratecalmente para identificar la fístula. Para su reconstrucción utilizamos la fascia lata en posición underlay recubierta por un injerto mucoperióstico del cornete. Se retiró el taponamiento a las 24-48 h y se administró ceftriaxona durante 5-7 días. Resultados: La etiología más frecuente fue la espontánea (48,4%), seguida de la traumática (24,2%), la iatrogénica (5%) y otras. La tasa de éxito en la primera cirugía fue del 91% en los defectos grandes y del 98% en los pequeños. Con la cirugía de rescate la tasa asciende al 100%. El seguimiento a largo plazo fue de 15,6 ± 12,4 meses para los defectos grandes y de 75,3 ± 51,3 meses para los pequeños, sin evidencia de recurrencias. Conclusión: La cirugía endoscópica es segura y eficaz en el cierre de los defectos de base de cráneo con o sin fístula activa. El tamaño del defecto juega un papel menor en el resultado. La fascia lata y el mucoperiostio del cornete son suficientes para la reparación de las fístulas pequeñas y medianas, mientras que se prefieren los colgajos nasoseptales para los defectos grandes (AU)

Objective: We present our experience in the reconstruction of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks according to their size and location. Material and methods: Fifty-four patients who underwent advanced skull base surgery (large defects) and 62 patients with CSF leaks of different origin (small and medium-sized defects) were included. Large defects were reconstructed with a nasoseptal pedicled flap positioned on fat and fascia lata and lumbar drainage was used. In small and medium-sized leaks of other origin, intrathecal fluorescein 5% was applied previously to identify the defect. Fascia lata in an underlay position was used for reconstruction, which was then covered with mucoperiosteum from the turbinate. Perioperative antibiotics were administered for 5-7 days. Nasal packing was removed after 24-48 hours. Results: The most frequent aetiology for small and medium-sized defects was spontaneous (48.4%), followed by trauma (24.2%), iatrogenic (5%) and others. The success rate was of 91% after the first surgery and 98% in large skull base defects and small/medium-sized respectively. After rescue surgery, the rate of closure achieved was 100%. The follow-up was 15.6 ± 12.4 months for large defects and 75.3 ± 51.3 months for small/medium-sized defects without recurrence. Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery for closure of any type of skull base defect is the gold standard approach. Defect size does not play a significant role in the success rate. Fascia lata and mucoperiosteum allow a reconstruction of small/medium-sized defects. For larger skull base defects, a combination of fat, fascia lata and nasoseptal pedicled flaps provide a successful reconstruction (AU)

[Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks according to size. Our experience]. / Manejo de las fístulas nasales de líquido cefalorraquídeo según su tamaño. Nuestra experiencia.

OBJECTIVE: We present our experience in the reconstruction of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks according to their size and location. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent advanced skull base surgery (large defects) and 62 patients with CSF leaks of different origin (small and medium-sized defects) were included. Large defects were reconstructed with a nasoseptal pedicled flap positioned on fat and fascia lata and lumbar drainage was used. In small and medium-sized leaks of other origin, intrathecal fluorescein 5% was applied previously to identify the defect. Fascia lata in an underlay position was used for reconstruction, which was then covered with mucoperiosteum from the turbinate. Perioperative antibiotics were administered for 5-7 days. Nasal packing was removed after 24-48 hours. RESULTS: The most frequent aetiology for small and medium-sized defects was spontaneous (48.4%), followed by trauma (24.2%), iatrogenic (5%) and others. The success rate was of 91% after the first surgery and 98% in large skull base defects and small/medium-sized respectively. After rescue surgery, the rate of closure achieved was 100%. The follow-up was 15.6 ± 12.4 months for large defects and 75.3 ± 51.3 months for small/medium-sized defects without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery for closure of any type of skull base defect is the gold standard approach. Defect size does not play a significant role in the success rate. Fascia lata and mucoperiosteum allow a reconstruction of small/medium-sized defects. For larger skull base defects, a combination of fat, fascia lata and nasoseptal pedicled flaps provide a successful reconstruction.